ISSN 0024-7081
Vol. 11, Issue 3, 1980January 01, 1980 CDT
ccby-4.0
A Re-Evaulation of Reciprocal Dealings Under the Federal Antitrust Laws: Spartan Grain & (and) Mill Co. v. Ayers
A Re-Evaulation of Reciprocal Dealings Under the Federal Antitrust Laws: Spartan Grain & (and) Mill Co. v. Ayers
Frank Pawlak,
Articles in Vol. 11, Issue 3, 1980
Vol. 11, Issue 3, 1980
- Table of ContentsJournal Loyola University of Chicago Law
- The <i>Muncie Gear</i> Doctrine and the Effect of Section 132 Upon ItRobert C. Ryan
- Consumer Service Transactions, Implied Warranty and a Mandate for Realistic ReformAndy Norman
- Tax-Exempt Mortgage Revenue Bonds: Another Case of "Opiate Economics"?Jan Brunken
- The Motivation Requirement in Single Employee Discharge CasesMichael R. Enright
- Director Dismissal of Shareholder Derivative Suits Under the Investment Company Act: <i>Burks v. Lasker</i>Lisa D. Marco
- A Balancing Analysis: The Construction of Illinois Home Rule Powers - <i>County of Cook v. John Sexton Contractors Company</i>Thomas M. O'Malley
- A Re-Evaulation of Reciprocal Dealings Under the Federal Antitrust Laws: <i>Spartan Grain & (and) Mill Co. v. Ayers</i>Frank Pawlak
- UCC Sections 5-102 and 5-103: A Solution to the Stand-by Letter of Credit Identity CrisisMiryam Rosie Rees
- <i>Knox v. North American Car Corp.:</i> Re-Examination of Privity of Conract in UCC Implied Warranty ActionsBarbara Stuetzer
Frank Pawlak, A Re-Evaulation of Reciprocal Dealings Under the Federal Antitrust Laws: Spartan Grain & (and) Mill Co. v. Ayers, 11 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 577 (1980).