ISSN 0024-7081
Vol. 11, Issue 3, 1980January 01, 1980 CDT
ccby-4.0
The Motivation Requirement in Single Employee Discharge Cases
The Motivation Requirement in Single Employee Discharge Cases
Michael R. Enright,
Articles in Vol. 11, Issue 3, 1980
Vol. 11, Issue 3, 1980
- Table of ContentsJournal Loyola University of Chicago Law
- The <i>Muncie Gear</i> Doctrine and the Effect of Section 132 Upon ItRobert C. Ryan
- Consumer Service Transactions, Implied Warranty and a Mandate for Realistic ReformAndy Norman
- Tax-Exempt Mortgage Revenue Bonds: Another Case of "Opiate Economics"?Jan Brunken
- The Motivation Requirement in Single Employee Discharge CasesMichael R. Enright
- Director Dismissal of Shareholder Derivative Suits Under the Investment Company Act: <i>Burks v. Lasker</i>Lisa D. Marco
- A Balancing Analysis: The Construction of Illinois Home Rule Powers - <i>County of Cook v. John Sexton Contractors Company</i>Thomas M. O'Malley
- A Re-Evaulation of Reciprocal Dealings Under the Federal Antitrust Laws: <i>Spartan Grain & (and) Mill Co. v. Ayers</i>Frank Pawlak
- UCC Sections 5-102 and 5-103: A Solution to the Stand-by Letter of Credit Identity CrisisMiryam Rosie Rees
- <i>Knox v. North American Car Corp.:</i> Re-Examination of Privity of Conract in UCC Implied Warranty ActionsBarbara Stuetzer
Michael R. Enright, The Motivation Requirement in Single Employee Discharge Cases, 11 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 501 (1980).