ISSN 0024-7081
Vol. 50, Issue 4, 2019January 01, 2019 CDT
ccby-4.0
The Role of Judging 50 Years After the “Chicago Seven” Trial: A Remembrance of Charles R. Garry
The Role of Judging 50 Years After the “Chicago Seven” Trial: A Remembrance of Charles R. Garry
Tucker Carrington,
Articles in Vol. 50, Issue 4, 2019
Vol. 50, Issue 4, 2019
- Table of ContentsJournal Loyola University Chicago Law
- Introduction to Issue 4Journal Loyola University Chicago Law
- Celebrating 50 Years: Reflections from Past Editors in ChiefJournal Loyola University Chicago Law
- Regulating Prosecutors’ Courtroom MisconductBruce A Green
- A Small Slice of the Chicago Eight TrialEllen S Podgor
- Judging Judges Fifty Years After—Was Judge Julius Hoffman’s Conduct So Different?Bennett L Gershman
- Judging During Crises: Can Judges Protect the Facts?Lissa Griffin
- Judicial Ethics: Lessons from the Chicago Eight TrialLaurie L Levenson
- Judges’ Misuse of Contempt in Criminal Cases and Limits of AdvocacyPeter A Joy
- Movements in the Discretionary Authority of Federal District Court Judges Over the Last 50 YearsSusan R Klein
- The Role of Judging 50 Years After the “Chicago Seven” Trial: A Remembrance of Charles R. GarryTucker Carrington
- Judge Damon Keith: The Judicial Antidote to Judge Julius Hoffman Challenging Claims of Unilateral Executive AuthorityEllen Yaroshevsky
- Reviving <em>Escobedo</em>Janet Moore
- The Litigation Rollercoaster of BIPA: A Comment on the Protection of Individuals from Violations of Biometric Information PrivacyAnna L Metzger
Tucker Carrington, The Role of Judging 50 Years After the “Chicago Seven” Trial: A Remembrance of Charles R. Garry, 50 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 969 (2019).