ISSN 0024-7081
Vol. 49, Issue 2, 2017January 01, 2017 CDT
ccby-4.0
China’s and India’s Differing Investment Treaty and Dispute Settlement Experiences and Implications for Africa
China’s and India’s Differing Investment Treaty and Dispute Settlement Experiences and Implications for Africa
Won Kidane,
Articles in Vol. 49, Issue 2, 2017
Vol. 49, Issue 2, 2017
- Table of ContentsJournal Loyola University Chicago Law
- Introduction to Issue TwoJournal Loyola University Chicago Law
- International Investment Law’s Unending Legitimation ProjectDavid Schneiderman
- Politics, Reason, and the Trajectory of Investor-State Dispute SettlementCharles H Brower II
- Crossfertilizing ISDS with TRIPSPeter K Yu
- The CETA Ratification Saga: The Demise of ISDS in EU Trade Agreements?David A Gantz
- The Return of State Remedies in Investor-State Dispute Settlement: Trends in Developing CountriesSonia E Rolland
- China’s and India’s Differing Investment Treaty and Dispute Settlement Experiences and Implications for AfricaWon Kidane
- The Incredible Shrinking Victory: Eli Lilly v. Canada, Success, Judicial Reversal, and Continuing Threats from Pharmaceutical ISDSBrook K BakerKatrina Geddes
- At the Intersection of Land Grievances and Legal Liability: The Need to Reconsider Contract Rights and Expectations at the Supranational LevelKaitlin Y CordesLise JohnsonSam Szoke-Burke
Won Kidane, China’s and India’s Differing Investment Treaty and Dispute Settlement Experiences and Implications for Africa, 49 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 405 (2017).