ISSN 0024-7081
Vol. 46, Issue 3, 2014January 01, 2014 CDT
ccby-4.0
Navigating Alternatives to Securities Fraud Class Actions: State Law and Opt-out Litigation
Navigating Alternatives to Securities Fraud Class Actions: State Law and Opt-out Litigation
Articles in Vol. 46, Issue 3, 2014
Vol. 46, Issue 3, 2014
- Table of ContentsJournal Loyola University Chicago Law
- Securities Litigation As A Window Into Supreme Court LitigationThomas Goldstein
- Random Thoughts of a Federal District JudgeShira A. Scheindlin Judge
- Navigating Alternatives to Securities Fraud Class Actions: State Law and Opt-out LitigationJeffrey Paul Mahoney
- Implications for Market Efficiency and Damages Analysis of Plaintiff Interpretations of <i> Halliburton II's </i> Statement that "market efficiency is a matter of degree"David Tabak
- The Road Map For Class Certification Post-<i> Halliburton II</i>Marc I. Gross
- The Importance of Conducting Thorough Investigations of Confidential Witnesses in Securities Fraud LitigationLeigh Handelman Smollar
- Class-Action Tolling, Federal Common Law, and Securities Statutes of Repose: A RecommendationWendy Gerwick Couture
- The Significance and Impact of Price Distortion and the Fraud-on-the-Market Theory after <i> Halliburton II</i>Charles W. Murdock
- Is There a Vatican School for Competition Policy?Tihamer Toth
- Rationing Environmental Law in a Time of Climate ChangeRachael E. Salcido
- Going Retro: Abolition For AllKevin Barry
Jeffrey Paul Mahoney, Navigating Alternatives to Securities Fraud Class Actions: State Law and Opt-out Litigation, 46 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 459 (2014).