ISSN 0024-7081
Vol. 44, Issue 3, 2013January 01, 2013 CDT
ccby-4.0
The Individual Mandate’s Due Process Legality: A Kantian Explanation, and Why It Matters
The Individual Mandate’s Due Process Legality: A Kantian Explanation, and Why It Matters
Articles in Vol. 44, Issue 3, 2013
Vol. 44, Issue 3, 2013
- Regretting <i>Roth</i>? Why and How the Supreme Court Could Deprive Tenured Public Teachers of Due Process Rights in EmploymentKarl D. Camillucci
- The Law is a Fractal: The Attempt to Anticipate EverythingAndrew Morrison Stumpff
- Could the American Psychiatric Association Cause You Headaches? The Dangerous Interaction between the <i>DSM-5</i> and Employment LawDouglas A. Hass
- Diverging Doctrine, Converging Outcomes: Evaluating Age Discrimination Law in the United Kingdom and the United StatesSusan Bisom-RappMalcolm Sargeant
- Over the Borderline--A Review of Margaret Price's <i>Mad at School: Rhetorics of Mental Disability and Academic Life</i>Gregory M. Duhl
- Am I My Brother's Keeper? A Tax Law Perspective on the Challenge of Balancing Gatekeeping Obligations and Zealous Advocacy in the Legal ProfessionRichard Lavoie
- The Individual Mandate's Due Process Legality: A Kantian Explanation, and Why It MattersPeter Brandon Bayer
- Reflections on the NLRB's Labor Law Jurisprudence after Wilma LiebmanDavid L. GregoryIan HayesAmanda Jaret
Peter Brandon Bayer, The Individual Mandate’s Due Process Legality: A Kantian Explanation, and Why It Matters, 44 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 865 (2013).