ISSN 0024-7081
Vol. 42, Issue 2, 2011January 01, 2011 CDT
ccby-4.0
The Distance Imperative: A Different Way of Thinking about Public Official Corruption Investigations/Prosecutions and the Federal Role
The Distance Imperative: A Different Way of Thinking about Public Official Corruption Investigations/Prosecutions and the Federal Role
Articles in Vol. 42, Issue 2, 2011
Vol. 42, Issue 2, 2011
- Table of ContentsJournal Loyola University Chicago Law
- The Distance Imperative: A Different Way of Thinking about Public Official Corruption Investigations/Prosecutions and the Federal RoleNorman Abrams
- Responding to Political Corruption: Some Institutional ConsiderationsJonathan L. Entin
- I Would, but I Need the Eggs: Why Neither Exit Nor Voice Substantially Limits Big City CorruptionDavid Schleicher
- Facts in Exile: Corruption and Abstraction in <i>Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission</i>Zephyr Teachout
- Defending the Formal Federal Civil Rulemaking Process: Why the Court Should Not Amend Procedural Rules through Judicial InterpretationNathan R. Sellers
Norman Abrams, The Distance Imperative: A Different Way of Thinking about Public Official Corruption Investigations/Prosecutions and the Federal Role, 42 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 207 (2011).