This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Skip to main content
Loy. U. Chi. L.J.
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • Articles
    • Book Review
    • Case Comments
    • Case Notes
    • Colloquium Articles
    • Commentaries
    • Comments
    • Conference Articles
    • Conference Essays & Remarks
    • Dedications
    • Developments
    • Essays
    • General
    • Mentorship Articles
    • Non-Colloquium Articles
    • Non-Colloquium Essay
    • Non-Conference Contributions
    • Notes
    • Prefatory Matter
    • Speeches
    • Symposium Articles
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • Membership
  • Symposium
  • search
  • X (formerly Twitter) (opens in a new tab)
  • LinkedIn (opens in a new tab)
  • RSS feed (opens a modal with a link to feed)

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

http://localhost:38318/feed
ISSN 0024-7081
Comments
Vol. 34, Issue 4, 2003January 01, 2003 CDT

Popov v. Hayashi, a Modern Day Pierson v. Post: A Comment on What the Court Should Have Done with the Seventy-Third Home Run Baseball Hit by Barry Bonds

Patrick Stoklas,
Copyright Logoccby-4.0
Photo by Mick Haupt on Unsplash
Loy. U. Chi. L.J.
Patrick Stoklas, Popov v. Hayashi, a Modern Day Pierson v. Post: A Comment on What the Court Should Have Done with the Seventy-Third Home Run Baseball Hit by Barry Bonds, 34 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 901 (2003).

View more stats

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system