ISSN 0024-7081
Vol. 34, Issue 1, 2002January 01, 2002 CDT
ccby-4.0
“It Is Emphatically the Province and Duty of the Judicial Department to Say” Who the President Is?
“It Is Emphatically the Province and Duty of the Judicial Department to Say” Who the President Is?
Articles in Vol. 34, Issue 1, 2002
Vol. 34, Issue 1, 2002
- How Should We Think about <i>Bush v. Gore</i>Erwin Chemerinsky
- Table of ContentsJournal Loyola University Chicago Law
- Supreme Democracy: <i>Bush v. Gore</i> ReduxLani Guinier
- Democracy and Legitimation: A Response to Professor GuinierLouis Michael Seidman
- Article II as Interpretive Theory: <i>Bush v. Gore</i> and the Retreat from <i>Erie</i>Robert A. Schapiro
- "It Is Emphatically the Province and Duty of the Judicial Department to Say" Who the President Is?David H. Coar
- <i>Bush v. Gore</i> and a Proper Separation of PowersGeorge Anastaplo
- Post-Election Legal Strategy in Florida: The Anatomy of Defeat and VictorySteve Bickerstaff
- In <i>Bush v. Gore</i>: Whatever Happened to the Due Process Ground?Roy A. Schotland
- Lien on Me: After <i>Craft</i>, a Federal Tax Lien Can Attach to Tenancy-by-the-Entirety PropertyColleen M. Feeney
David H. Coar, “It Is Emphatically the Province and Duty of the Judicial Department to Say” Who the President Is?, 34 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 121 (2002).