ISSN 0024-7081
Vol. 32, Issue 3, 2001January 01, 2001 CDT
ccby-4.0
Multidisciplinary Practice and the Future of the Legal Profession: Considering a Role for Independent Directors
Multidisciplinary Practice and the Future of the Legal Profession: Considering a Role for Independent Directors
Articles in Vol. 32, Issue 3, 2001
Vol. 32, Issue 3, 2001
- Table of ContentsJournal Loyola University Chicago Law
- Introduction: Multidisciplinary Practice SymposiumDaniel G. Rosenberg
- Why Say No to Multidisciplinary Practice?Edieth Y. Wu
- Multidisciplinary Practice and the Future of the Legal Profession: Considering a Role for Independent DirectorsJohn H. MathesonPeter D. Favorite
- Consensus across Multiple Divides: An Empirical Study of Outlooks Underlying Lawyers' Attitudes on Multidisciplinary PracticeGreg CaseyCarol A. Needham
- From Misapplication to No Application of the Issue Exhaustion Doctrine in Social Security Cases: <i>Sims v. Apfel</i>Lori Oosterbaan
- <i>Nichol v. Stass</i>: Ending Predictability for Foster Parents in the Law of Sovereign and Parental ImmunitySarie E. Winner
John H. Matheson & Peter D. Favorite, Multidisciplinary Practice and the Future of the Legal Profession: Considering a Role for Independent Directors, 32 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 577 (2001).