ISSN 0024-7081
Vol. 31, Issue 4, 2000January 01, 2000 CDT
ccby-4.0
Analysis of the Valuation of Attorney Work Product According to the Market for Claims: Reformulating the Lodestar Method
Analysis of the Valuation of Attorney Work Product According to the Market for Claims: Reformulating the Lodestar Method
Articles in Vol. 31, Issue 4, 2000
Vol. 31, Issue 4, 2000
- Table of ContentsJournal Loyola University Chicago Law
- Informed Consent Law and the Forgotten Duty of Physician InquiryRobert Gatter
- Analysis of the Valuation of Attorney Work Product According to the Market for Claims: Reformulating the Lodestar MethodGeorge B. Murr
- RICO and the Legislative Supremacy Approach to Federal Criminal LawmakingBrian Slocum
- Partial-Birth Abortion: Should Moral Judgment Prevail over Medical Judgment?Karen E. Walther
- The Mandated Move from Institutions to Community Care: <i>Olmstead v. L.C.</i>Laura C. Scotellaro
George B. Murr, Analysis of the Valuation of Attorney Work Product According to the Market for Claims: Reformulating the Lodestar Method, 31 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 599 (2000).