ISSN 0024-7081
Vol. 32, Issue 1, 2000January 01, 2000 CDT
ccby-4.0
Revisiting the Question of Whether Young Children in Child Protection Proceedings Should Be Represented by Lawyers
Revisiting the Question of Whether Young Children in Child Protection Proceedings Should Be Represented by Lawyers
Articles in Vol. 32, Issue 1, 2000
Vol. 32, Issue 1, 2000
- Table of ContentsJournal Loyola University Chicago Law
- Revisiting the Question of Whether Young Children in Child Protection Proceedings Should Be Represented by LawyersRandi Mandelbaum
- Filling in the Silence: Domestic Violence, Literature and LawElizabeth Williers Gemmette
- Bringing Globalism Home: Lessons from Antitrust and BeyondSpencer Weber Waller
- Professor Waller's Un-American Approach to AntitrustRobert H. Lande
- Commentary on Professor Spencer Weber Waller, <i>Bringing Globalism Home: Lessons from Antitrust and Beyond</i>W. David Braun
- Pleading Scienter under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995: Did Congress Eliminate Recklessness, Motive, and Opportunity?Nicole M. Briski
- Enforcing the Speech Limit: <i>Nixon v. Shrink Missouri Government PAC</i>Dean N. Fugate
- <i>United States v. Morrison</i>: Federalism against the Will of the StatesJil L. Martin
Randi Mandelbaum, Revisiting the Question of Whether Young Children in Child Protection Proceedings Should Be Represented by Lawyers, 32 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 1 (2000).