ISSN 0024-7081
Vol. 31, Issue 1, 1999January 01, 1999 CDT
ccby-4.0
Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole v. Scott: Who Should Swallow the Bitter Pill of the Exclusionary Rule? The Supreme Court Passes the Cup
Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole v. Scott: Who Should Swallow the Bitter Pill of the Exclusionary Rule? The Supreme Court Passes the Cup
Patrick Alexander,
Articles in Vol. 31, Issue 1, 1999
Vol. 31, Issue 1, 1999
- Table of ContentsJournal Loyola University Chicago Law
- Bright-Line Rules: Development of the Law of Search and Seizure during Traffic StopsDaniel T. Gillespie
- The Road Paved with Good Intentions: Problems and Potential for Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance under ERISAJana K. StrainEleanor D. Kinney
- <i>Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole v. Scott</i>: Who Should Swallow the Bitter Pill of the Exclusionary Rule? The Supreme Court Passes the CupPatrick Alexander
- <i>City of Chicago v. Morales</i>: Sacrificing Individual Liberty Interests for Community SafetyAngela L. Clark
Patrick Alexander, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole v. Scott: Who Should Swallow the Bitter Pill of the Exclusionary Rule? The Supreme Court Passes the Cup, 31 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 69 (1999).