ISSN 0024-7081
Vol. 30, Issue 1, 1998January 01, 1998 CDT
ccby-4.0
Kansas v. Hendricks: Absent a Clear Meaning of Punishment, States Are Permitted to Violate Double Jeopardy Clause
Kansas v. Hendricks: Absent a Clear Meaning of Punishment, States Are Permitted to Violate Double Jeopardy Clause
Andrew D. Campbell,
Articles in Vol. 30, Issue 1, 1998
Vol. 30, Issue 1, 1998
- A Law Enforcement Primer on Vehicle SearchesKevin Carr
- Table of contentsjournal Loyola University Chicago law
- "X-File" Law School Pedagogy: Keeping the Truth out ThereKevin H. Smith
- <i>Kansas v. Hendricks</i>: Absent a Clear Meaning of Punishment, States Are Permitted to Violate Double Jeopardy ClauseAndrew D. Campbell
- <i>Saratoga Fishing Co. v. J.M. Martinac & Co.</i>: Bailing out the Lazy Commercial Purchaser from the Murky Waters of ResaleMeredith J. Ringler
Andrew D. Campbell, Kansas v. Hendricks: Absent a Clear Meaning of Punishment, States Are Permitted to Violate Double Jeopardy Clause, 30 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 87 (1998).