Vol. 23, Issue 2, 1992January 01, 1992 CDT
ccby-4.0
Suppressed v. Suppressed: A Court’s Refusal to Remedy the Legal Profession’s “Dirty Little Secret,” Attorney-Client Sexual Exploitation
Suppressed v. Suppressed: A Court’s Refusal to Remedy the Legal Profession’s “Dirty Little Secret,” Attorney-Client Sexual Exploitation
Robert H. Muriel,
Robert H. Muriel, Suppressed v. Suppressed: A Court’s Refusal to Remedy the Legal Profession’s “Dirty Little Secret,” Attorney-Client Sexual Exploitation, 23 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 309 (1992).