ISSN 0024-7081
Vol. 21, Issue 3, 1990January 01, 1990 CDT
ccby-4.0
Policing Discovery Under Illinois Supreme Court Rule 219(c): A Search for Judicial Consistency
Policing Discovery Under Illinois Supreme Court Rule 219(c): A Search for Judicial Consistency
Kathleen M. Potocki,
Articles in Vol. 21, Issue 3, 1990
Vol. 21, Issue 3, 1990
- Table of ContentsJournal Loyola University Law
- Legal Malpractice: Is It Tort or Contract?Blanche M. Manning Honorable
- To Boldly Go Where No One Has Gone Before: The Final Frontier of Illinois Expert Winess Testimony in Medical Malpractice CasesCharles Chapman HonorableRobert Robertson
- <i>Illinois v. Perkins:</i> Approving the Use of Police Trickery in Prison to Circumvent MirandaCharles E Glennon HonorableTayebe Shah-Mirani
- The Vagaries of Rule 103(b)Robert G. JohnstonIain D. Johnston
- Observations on Recent Efforts to Deter Frivolous Papers in the Illinois Circuit CourtsJeffrey A. Parness
- <i>Diminskis v. Chicago Transit Authority:</i> Circumventing Expert Witness DiscoveryAdrian M. Vuckovich
- Judicial Self-Defense in the Court of Public OpinionSeth Kaberon
- The Admissibility of Scientific Evidence in IllinoisM. Thaddeus Murphy
- Policing Discovery Under Illinois Supreme Court Rule 219(c): A Search for Judicial ConsistencyKathleen M. Potocki
Kathleen M. Potocki, Policing Discovery Under Illinois Supreme Court Rule 219(c): A Search for Judicial Consistency, 21 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 973 (1990).