ISSN 0024-7081
Vol. 14, Issue 3, 1983January 01, 1983 CDT
ccby-4.0
Should Contribution Among Tortfeasors Be Permitted in Actions Arising Under the Illinois Dram Shop Act?
Should Contribution Among Tortfeasors Be Permitted in Actions Arising Under the Illinois Dram Shop Act?
Pete Almeroth,
Articles in Vol. 14, Issue 3, 1983
Vol. 14, Issue 3, 1983
- Table of ContentsJournal Loyola University Chicago Law
- ForewordAllen Hartman Honorable
- Ancillary Jurisdiction: Plaintiffs' Claims Against Nondiverse Third-Party DefendantsPamela J. Stephens
- Third-Party Actions: A Plaintiff's PerspectiveCurt N. Rodin
- Risk Shifting Devices and Third-Party Practice: The Impact of <i>Skinner</i> and <i>Alvis</i>Miles J. ZaremskiPaul Cottrell
- Should Contribution Among Tortfeasors Be Permitted in Actions Arising Under the Illinois Dram Shop Act?Pete Almeroth
- Implied Indemnity after <i>Skinner</i> and the Illinois Contribution Act: The Case for a Uniform StandardSuzanne Haraburd Anich
- <i>Larson v. Buschkamp:</i> The Effect of Contribution on the Parent-Child Tort Immunity Doctrine and Its Implications for Strict Liability in IllinoisCeleste Marie King
- Contribution in Antitrust Actions: Is Fairness Reason Enough?Laura J. Lodawer
- Loss Allocation in Strict Products Liability in Illinois: <i>Coney v. J.L.G. Industries, Inc.</i>Lou Ann Reichle
- A Survey of Contribution: Equal or Fault-Based Shares?Donald A. Smith
Pete Almeroth, Should Contribution Among Tortfeasors Be Permitted in Actions Arising Under the Illinois Dram Shop Act?, 14 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 503 (1983).