ISSN 0024-7081
Vol. 13, Issue 4, 1982January 01, 1982 CDT
ccby-4.0
Federal Criminal Sentencing: The Case for Evidentiary Standards
Federal Criminal Sentencing: The Case for Evidentiary Standards
Articles in Vol. 13, Issue 4, 1982
Vol. 13, Issue 4, 1982
- Table of ContentsJournal Loyola University Chicago Law
- ForewordJames P. Carey
- Sentencing Provisions and Considerations in the Federal SystemStanley J. Roszkowski Honorable
- The Prosecutor's Function in SentencingDan K. WebbScott F. Turow
- Federal Parole and Federal Sentencing: A Report on the Present and Some Thoughts for the FutureDavid J. Gottlieb
- Bringing the Rule of Law to Criminal Sentencing: Judicial Review, Sentencing Guidelines and a Policy of Just DesertsPeter A. Ozanne
- Poetry and the Criminal Law: The Idea of Punishment in Shakespeare's Measure for MeasureWilliam T. Braithwaite
- Capital Punishment and Crimes of MurderDorean M. Koenig
- Commentary on <i>Bullington v. Missouri</i>Richard Sindel
- Sentencing Under the Federal Youth Corrections Act: When May a Youth Be Treated as an Adult?Cynthia A. Kelly
- Federal Criminal Sentencing: The Case for Evidentiary StandardsFrank D. Giorno
- Current Developments in Corrections and the Lawyer's Role at SentencingWalter Dickey
- Past Arrests and Perceived Perjury as Sentencing Factors in IllinoisValerie J. Fisher
- Criminal Sentencing Legislation Pending Before the Ninety-Seventh CongressTimothy J. Frenzer
- Criminal Sentencing in Antitrust CasesMary Patricia Kerns
- Prosecutorial Vindictiveness and the Plea Bargaining Exception:<i> Bordenkircher v. Hayes</i> Four Years LaterChristine Schaack McGoey
- Separation of Powers and the Illinois Habitual Offender Act: Who Sentences the Habitual Criminal?Terence J. Moran
- Liberal Construction and Severe Sentencing Help RICO Achieve Its Legislative GoalsRegina Kwan Peterson
Frank D. Giorno, Federal Criminal Sentencing: The Case for Evidentiary Standards, 13 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 875 (1982).