Vol. 3, Issue 1, 1972January 01, 1972 CDT
ccby-4.0
Criminal Law - Statement Inadmissable Against a Defendant in the Prosecution’s Case in Chief Because of Lack of the Procedural Safeguards Required by Miranda v. Arizona, May, if Its Trustworthiness Satisfies Legal Standards, Be Used for Impeachment Purposes to Attack the Credibility of the Defendant’s Trial Testimony
Criminal Law - Statement Inadmissable Against a Defendant in the Prosecution’s Case in Chief Because of Lack of the Procedural Safeguards Required by Miranda v. Arizona, May, if Its Trustworthiness Satisfies Legal Standards, Be Used for Impeachment Purposes to Attack the Credibility of the Defendant’s Trial Testimony
Ronald V. Hirst,
Ronald V. Hirst, Criminal Law - Statement Inadmissable Against a Defendant in the Prosecution’s Case in Chief Because of Lack of the Procedural Safeguards Required by Miranda v. Arizona, May, If Its Trustworthiness Satisfies Legal Standards, Be Used for Impeachment Purposes to Attack the Credibility of the Defendant’s Trial Testimony, 3 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 169 (1972).