Vol. 2, Issue 1, 1971January 01, 1971 CDT
ccby-4.0
Constitutional Law - Evidence - Substantive Use of Witness’ Prior Inconsistent Statement Does Not Violate the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution
Constitutional Law - Evidence - Substantive Use of Witness’ Prior Inconsistent Statement Does Not Violate the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution
Gerald L. Morel,
Gerald L. Morel, Constitutional Law - Evidence - Substantive Use of Witness’ Prior Inconsistent Statement Does Not Violate the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution, 2 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 238 (1971).